subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
advertise
careers industry jobs
events events
FAQ
Mcgraw Hill Construction
ENR Logo
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
& receive immediate web access
comment

The Top 50 Program Management Firms

Text size: A A

The steady market for professional services firms can be seen in the results on ENR’s Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee and Program Management list. Revenue for the CM-PM group rose 1.0%, to $19.41 billion, in 2013. Domestic revenue from CM-PM work rose 2.0%, to $14.62 billion, in 2013. This marks a rebound for the domestic market, which had declined from 2011 to 2012, the first such decline since 2003.

The table below shows only rankings and firm name. For complete data from the Top CM-for-Fee list see the following links.

The Top 50 Program Management Firms
RANK FIRM TOTAL REVENUE
2014
1
CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo.
2,291.5
2
Bechtel, San Francisco, Calif.
1,318.0
3
URS Corp., San Francisco, Calif.
1,303.6
4
Jacobs, Pasadena, Calif.
1,210.1
5
AECOM Technology Corp., Los Angeles, Calif.
912.6
6
Parsons, Pasadena, Calif.
843.3
7
Leidos, Reston, Va.
510.9
8
Parsons Brinckerhoff, New York, N.Y.
445.4
9
Jones Lang LaSalle, Chicago, Ill.
424.4
10
CBRE Inc., Los Angeles, Calif.
417.8
11
Hill International, Marlton, N.J.
401.6
12
Louis Berger, Morristown, N.J.
176.9
13
Atkins North America / Faithful+Gould, Tampa, Fla.
176.4
14
Burns & McDonnell, Kansas City, Mo.
135.8
15
CDM Smith, Cambridge, Mass.
105.7
16
Barton Malow Co., Southfield, Mich.
100.5
17
Black & Veatch, Overland Park, Kan.
96.8
18
Infrastructure Corp. of America, Brentwood, Tenn.
94.5
19
WorleyParsons Group Inc., Bellaire, Texas
84.6
20
HDR, Omaha, Neb.
84.6
21
Arcadis U.S./RTKL, Highlands Ranch, Colo.
84.0
22
Anvil Corp., Bellingham, Wash.
70.0
23
Tetra Tech Inc., Pasadena, Calif.
65.0
24
Halmar International, Nanuet, N.Y.
60.0
25
Heery International Inc., Atlanta, Ga.
56.1
26
Lend Lease, New York, N.Y.
53.3
27
Turner & Townsend Inc., New York, N.Y.
36.0
28
RS&H Inc., Jacksonville, Fla.
35.3
29
Gilbane Building Co., Providence, R.I.
34.2
30
Stantec Inc., Irvine, Calif.
33.4
31
Cassidy Turley, Washington, D.C.
32.2
32
Vanir Construction Management Inc., Sacramento, Calif.
30.0
33
McDonough Bolyard Peck Inc., Fairfax, Va.
29.8
34
Alpha Corp., Dulles, Va.
27.8
35
Project Time & Cost LLC, Atlanta, Ga.
27.6
36
Hatch Mott MacDonald, Iselin, N.J.
27.6
37
Balfour Beatty US, Dallas, Texas
25.2
38
Lea+Elliott Inc., Grand Prairie, Texas
25.0
39
OHL USA Inc., New York, N.Y.
25.0
40
Cordoba Corp., Los Angeles, Calif.
22.6
41
Cushman & Wakefield, New York, N.Y.
19.8
42
DLZ, Columbus, Ohio
18.8
43
On-Board Engineering Corp., East Windsor, N.J.
18.7
44
Hoar Program Management, Birmingham, Ala.
18.2
45
McKissack & McKissack, Washington, D.C.
17.3
46
SGI Construction Management, Pasadena, Calif.
17.1
47
PMA Consultants LLC, Detroit, Mich.
16.9
48
LPCiminelli Inc., Buffalo, N.Y.
16.9
49
Broaddus & Associates, Austin, Texas
16.4
50
Gafcon Inc., San Diego, Calif.
16.2

ENR Top Lists or selections from the directory databases are available on pressure-sensitive labels or computer printouts. Included are the principal officer's name and title, company name and address, and phone and fax numbers. Click here for information on purchasing mailing lists.

----- Advertising -----
Dodge Lead Center
Search for local construction projects OR CALL 877-234-4246 and get a FREE Lead Now!
Search by Project Type & State





Promote your Top List Ranking with our special merchandising offers
Congratulations! Communicate this notable achievement with our special offers.
----- Advertising -----
 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.