Advocates at Work
On August 10, 2005, President
George W. Bush signed a new, six-year federal
highway and transit program authorization bill
into law. Over the preceding six years, no private
organization devoted more time, energy or resources
than the American Road & Transportation Builders
Association toward making that law the best it
was possible to be in terms of serving the interests
of the U.S. transportation construction industry.
Websters defines an advocate as one
who leads the cause of another. The American
Road & Transportation Builders Association
(ARTBA) is an advocatethe transportation
construction industrys primary advocate
in the nations capital and in federal courts
across the nation.
The causethe core missionhas not changed
since the association was formed in 1902. ARTBA,
led by visionary and focused leaders from across
the transportation construction industry, works
to build federal investment in transportation
infrastructure programs. As it pushes that agenda
in the halls of Congress, ARTBA also works to
ensure that its members views and business
concerns are addressed as those programs are structured
and operated.
It has often been saidand
is a truism in Washingtonthat politics
is the art of the doable. Successful advocates,
however, do not pull their punches,
compromise or try to finesse their
core positions, or retreat at the first sign of
political pushback. They steadfastly stay the
course... and push. For they know, as political
observer and author, Leo Bogart, put well, it
is never the opinion of the moment, but the potential
for opinion change which must occupy those who
seek to exert political influence.
In
Washington, the political game is not over until
it is over. Wearing people and positions down
by dragging the political process out is a high
art form in the nations capital. The advocate
knows that and responds accordingly. And then,
when the politicians declare the game over, win
or lose, the advocate picks up the pieces and
continues pushing forwardbecause the new
game has just begun.
That is how ARTBA approached the reauthorization
of TEA-21, the 1998 highway and transit act. The
association, guided by a strong and focused board
of directors and an aggressive leadership team,
set goals...established a plan to help achieve
them...and then aggressively pursued those goals
to the endstanding tall on behalf of its
members and not wavering in the face of political
pressure, knowing that to back down would be to
negotiate with itself.
This is the story of your industry advocateARTBAat
work.
Representing
the [transportation] construction industry,
ARTBA has been a constant presence on highway
issues. Theyre huge. Theyre
very involved in this, said a congressional
staffer. ARTBA President Pete Ruane has led
the group since 1988, expanding its issue,
advertising, coalition building and grassroots
lobbying efforts. |
Record Federal Highway &
Transit Investment
The TEA-21 reauthorization
legislation signed by President Bush, the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation
Equity ActA Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU),
includes many positive changes to federal policy
and law long advocated by ARTBA in the areas of
project planning and environmental reviews, project
litigation, safety in the construction work zone
and on rural roads, and the fostering of public-private
partnerships and financing.
SAFETEA-LU also provides total guaranteed funding
of $286.5 billion over six years ending in FY
2009: $227.6 billion for the federal-aid highway
program; $52.6 billion for state and local transit
programs; and $6.3 billion for the highway safety
activities.
Under SAFETEA-LU, federal highway investment will
grow an average of 4.4% per year from the FY 2004
baseline of $34.4 billiona relatively modest,
yet hard fought for, 1.8% average annual increase
when the impacts of projected inflation are taken
into account. Under the new law, the federal transit
program will grow annually by an average 6.3%,
or an anticipated 3.6% average increase annually
after adjusting for projected inflation.
To accomplish these levels of annually increasingand
historically highinvestment, SAFETEA-LU
will use all revenue flowing into the Highway
Trust Fund (HTF) through FY 2009 and also most
of the cash balance existing in the fund when
the law was enacted.
But that just didnt happen.
Ethanol Tax Reform: The
Story Behind the Numbers & Major Achievement
Heavy political pressure
was brought to bear to constrain investment in
the new highway and transit law as it was being
developed by Congress. Indeed, the debate between
the Congress and the White House over funding
necessitated passage of 11 short-term extensions
of the federal highway and transit programs after
TEA-21 authority expired on October 1, 2003. The
Bush administrations first SAFETEA proposal,
sent to Congress in May 2003, called for a $190.2
billion six-year highway investment. Its position
evolved to support for a $201.6 six-year highway
investment in its FY 2005 budget request to Congress
in February 2004.
The real story behind the funding achievement
that is SAFETEA-LU is an important, ARTBA-championed
federal tax reform that was enacted in late 2004
as part of a large corporate tax overhaul bill.
That law ensures, for the first time, that the
Highway Trust Fund would be fully compensated
for ethanol-blended motor fuel sales. As a result,
revenue to the trust fund will increase by $19
billion through FY 2009. That is the equivalent
of a new, permanent, two-and-a-half cent increase
in the federal motor fuels excise.
|
The 2005 Highway/Transit
Act contains important policies recommended
by ARTBAs TEA-21 Reauthorization Task
Force in 2001:
- Ethanol motor
fuel tax reforms that created a permanent,
new revenue stream for the Highway Trust
Fund, providing an additional $19 billion
for SAFETEA-LU investments.
- Creation of blue ribbon
commission to make recommendations to Congress
on how to meet future highway and transit
capital investment requirements.
- A draw down of the Highway Trust
Fund balance.
- Continuation of TEA-21s budgetary
firewalls.
- Allowing of tax-exempt financing
for highway projects and expanded use of
innovative financing and tolling.
- Expedited TEA-21 environmental review
and project approval processes.
- Reform of the transportation conformity
requirements with the Clean Air Act, including
a 12-month grace period before an areas
federal highway funds are threatened.
- Initiating unit bid pricing for work
zone safety measures on federal-aid projects.
- Guarding against unlawful user fee
evasion, which will help generate almost
$2 billion in new Highway Trust Fund revenues.
|
This tax-reform is the primary
source of the funding increases accomplished under
SAFETEA-LU!
 |
| Left to right: ARTBA President
& CEO Pete Ruane; 2005 ARTBA Chairman
Rich Wagman; Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
(R-Tenn.); and 2005 ARTBA Senior Vice Chairman
Gene McCormick met in July 2005 to discuss
the status of the highway/transit bill. |
 |
| President Bush signed the
new highway/transit act at a Caterpillar manufacturing
facility in Illinois. ARTBA leaders attending
the event at the ARTBA member firms
plant included ARTBA Chairman Rich Wagman,
ARTBA Senior Vice Chairman Gene McCormick
and ARTBA Central Region Vice Chairman Larry
Tate. |
Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)
and Max Baucus (D-Mont.), leaders of the Senate
Finance Committee, and Rep. Bill Thomas (R-Calif.),
chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee,
and the committees ranking Democrat Rep.
Charles Rangel (N.Y.), led the congressional drive
for ethanol tax reform.
The ARTBA team worked closely with their staffs
and the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), the
ethanol producers organization, to provide
economic research in support of it, and then lead
the external grassroots and direct lobbying effort
that resulted in success. RFA recognized ARTBAs
unique leadership role in the effort by presenting
the association with its Industry Partner
Award.
ARTBA sought White House support for the ethanol
initiative in a one-hour private meeting with
White House Office of Management & Budget
Director Joshua Bolten and his top staff in January
2004.
ARTBA: Setting the
Agenda & Framing the Debate
ARTBA helped set the TEA-21
reauthorization legislative and policy agenda
and frame the debate when it sent a 72-page report
to Congress and the Bush Administration in May
2001the first national organization to publicly
articulate its TEA-21 goals.
In testimony to ARTBAs standing as the consensus
voice of the transportation construction industry
in Washington, D.C.and the credibility of
the fact-based analysis it uses to support its
advocacy positionsARTBA was invited to provide
an expert witness to testify before 14 congressional
hearings held in conjunction with TEA-21 reauthorization
issues. No other national construction-related
association, representing any interest, was asked
for that level of official input by the U.S. Congress!
The Transportation
Makes America Work! Campaign
 |
| ARTBA President Pete Ruane
and House Ways & Means Committee Member
Rep. Kenny Hulshoff (R-Mo.) at a September
2003 press conference discussing the need
for ethanol tax reform. |
|
|
| ARTBA First Vice Chairman
Rich Wagman, G.A. & F.C. Wagman, testified
in March 2003 before the Senate Subcommittee
on Clean Air, Climate Change and Nuclear Safety
and urged reform to the tax treatment of ethanol-based
motor fuels. |
To advance its TEA-21 reauthorization
legislative agenda, in October 2002, the ARTBA
Board of Directors launched an ambitious, $2 million
public affairs campaign designed to help shape
and move the debate in the nations capital.
The ARTBA Transportation Makes America Work!
(TMAW) program employed tools used in political
campaignsa grassroots mobilization program,
opinion polling, print and radio advertising,
issue-based economic research, a targeted national
media tour, conferences and media events, issue
backgrounders and publications, a dedicated Internet
site, project-specific consultants and coalition
leadership and projectsto support the associations
direct lobbying activities.
A hallmark of TMAW was the use of cutting-edge
communications technology. For example, our award-winning
Mobilize! grassroots action program
featured a DVD/Internet toolkit which was implemented
by companies across the nation. The TMAW internet
site provided a cornucopia of information and
lobbying tools heavily used by industry activists
and media.
The TMAW-supported ARTBA Action Hotline
provided a toll-free phone tree for grassroots
activists that included routinely updated status
reports and a seamless phone patch-through to
congressional offices on Capitol Hill. These tools
were put to extensive use by the associations
affiliated state contractor associations and the
newly-launched, corporate-based ARTBA Grassroots
Action Team.
While it will only be a footnote in the history
of the long struggle to enact a multi-year TEA-21
reauthorization bill, those who supported the
TMAW campaign can take pride in the fact that
the House Transportation & Infrastructure
Committee overwhelmingly approved a six-year bill
in March 2004, that embraced the needs-driven
federal highway and transit investment program
first proposed by ARTBA. The bill called for a
$375 billion investment in state and local transportation
programs.
Bringing an Unparalleled
Lobbying Team to Work for ARTBA Members
 |
| ARTBA members, led by the
Association of Equipment Manufacturers, contributed
more than $2 million to the ARTBA Industry
Advancement Fund to support the aggressive
Transportation Makes America Work!
grassroots lobbying and communications program.
Pictured: AEM Chairman Ron DeFeo, Terex Corp.
(left), and ARTBA Chairman Tom Hill, Oldcastle
Materials, check campaign progress in spring
2003. |
Unlike many associations
in the nations capital, everyone on the
ARTBA staff is involved in pushing its message
as direct lobbyists. For example, when an important
vote came before the House or Senate, the entire
ARTBA staff often manned the phones to ensure
that every House or Senate member knew where ARTBA
stood on the issue.
That said, the ARTBA TEA-21 direct and grassroots
lobbying programs were led by the transportation
construction industrys deepest, most experienced,
and seasoned Washington public affairs staff.
The team included:
Dr. Pete Ruane, president and CEOreferred
to as the Dean of transportation lobbyists
by the respected publication, Congressional Quarterlywho
has been personally involved in the development
of every federal highway/transit program reauthorization
since 1980 and serves as vice chairman of the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce-led Americans for Transportation
Mobility (ATM) coalition;
Bill Toohey, executive vice president and
COO, a veteran of the last four reauthorizations
and the architect of the Transportation
Makes America Work! campaign;
David Bauer, senior vice president of government
relations, a veteran of the ARTBA TEA-21 campaign,
who served six years as a legislative aide to
the chairman of the Senate transportation appropriations
subcommittee and coordinated reauthorization activities
of the Transportation Construction Coalition (TCC);
When
the American Road and Transportation Builders
Association began getting ready for one of
its biggest fights ever, it went out and hired
the Republican media firm Wilson-Grand Communications
to do its radio spots...running on District
talk-radio stations...The road-builders lobby
also pasted up ads inside Capitol Hill Metro
stations heavily trafficked by congressional
staffers; more ads on the 2004 calendar put
out by policy-wonkish National Journal; and
in the inside-baseball Capitol Hill newspapers
Roll Call and CongressDaily AM. |
Jim Kolb, vice president
of congressional relations, former director of
congressional relations for the U.S. DOT during
the Clinton administration and a past Capitol
Hill staffer and union lobbyist;
Rich Juliano, vice president of chapter
relations and grassroots programs, the White House
Liaison to the U.S. DOT and a policy advisor to
Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta in 2001-02
and the former deputy chairman of the Illinois
Republican Party, who served as the state liaison
to the 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign;
Larry Russell, director of western operations
and grassroots programs, who was the field director
for the successful 2004 John Thune (R-S.D.) for
U.S. Senate campaign and ground zero
field operation coordinator for the 2004 Bush-Cheney
campaign in Cleveland, Ohio;
Matt Jeanneret, vice president of communications,
a veteran of the ARTBA TEA-21 campaign in 1998
and former aide to a U.S. senator and a federal
agency spokesman in the Bush I administration;
 |
| ARTBA Central Region Vice
Chairman Larry Tate, Caterpillar Paving Products,
Inc., discussed reauthorization with FHWA
Administrator Mary Peters during a 2004 visit
to the companys plant in Minnesota. |
|
|
| ARTBAs singular leadership
on ethanol tax reform was recognized with
a national Industry Partner Award
from the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA)
in February 2005. ARTBA Senior Vice President
of Government Relations, David Bauer (right),
accepted the award from RFA President &
CEO Bob Dineen. |
Dr. Bill Buechner,
ARTBAs Harvard-trained vice president of
economics and research, also a veteran of the
associations TEA-21 campaign, who served
for over two decades as staff economist for the
Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress;
and
Brad Sant, vice president
of safety and training, who, with multiple safety
certifications and a Georgetown University law
degree, worked with Congressional staff crafting
the important new safety provisions in SAFETEA-LU.
ARTBA also brought in top-level political consultants
to assist its volunteer leadership and staff TEA-21
reauthorization team on targeted assignments.
The ARTBA TMAW consulting team included:
Former House Ways & Means Committee
Chairman Bill Archer (R-Texas) and his legislative
consulting group at the PriceWaterhouseCoopers
Washington, D.C., office;
Cassidy & Associates
Greg Hartley, an 18-year senior staffer and top
advisor to House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.)
and Dawn Levy, former senior tax and transportation
counsel to Senate Finance Committee Ranking Democrat
Max Baucus (Mont.);
The Carmen Groups
David Carmen, David Keene, former advisor to Presidents
Reagan and Bush I and chairman of the American
Conservative Union, and Gary Hoitsma, eight-year
aide to Senate Environment & Public Works
Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.);
John Zogby, chairman
of Zogby International, one of the nations
premier political polling firms;
Top Republican and
Democratic pollsters Ed Goeas and Celinda Lake,
directors of the Tarrance Groups respected
Battleground Omnibus Poll;
Wilson-Grand, a leading
national Republican political advertising and
media consulting firm;
ARTBAs
early blitzkrieg shows how Washington trade
associations try to steer debate on important
legislative matters that directly affect their
members.
Hand
it to the highway lobby. Even when they lose,
they dont lose...This year, Congress
failed to enact a scaled-back $318 billion,
six-year bill that the highway lobby advocated,
leaving the industry with a temporary extension
of the bill. Nonetheless, Congress did approve,
as part of the FSC/ETI tax policy bill, a
reform in the way ethanol fuel is taxed that
will net the federal highway trust funddrum
roll$22.4 billion over six years. Thats
$4 billion a year for transportation projects,
in a year when the lobby didnt get what
it wanted. |
Global Insight, the
world-renowned economic research and forecasting
operation;
Dr. Jon Deason, former
top official with the U.S. Dept. of the Interior
and director of the Environmental & Energy
Management Graduate Program at The George Washington
University; and
Ed Graber, former
director of congressional relations for AGC of
America.
The New Game Begins
During the long road that
was TEA-21 reauthorization, ARTBA advanced the
interests of the U.S. transportation construction
industry. Period.
While the association and its members accomplished
much with the enactment of SAFETEA-LU, the job
is not over! Ensuring that America has the dynamic
surface transportation network that is needed
to meet the enormous mobility, safety and security
challenges ahead will require a much larger federal
investment in highways and transit than was provided
by SAFETEA-LU.
ARTBA is already working on the SAFETEA-LU reauthorization,
due in 2009, to help make that happen!
Executive
Viewpoint ASTEC
J. Neal Ferry
Executive Vice President
Astec Industries, Inc.
Q: How big a role does Astec
play in North American transportation?
A:
Astec as a corporation builds asphalt plants,
asphalt pavers, profiling machines, asphalt material
transfer machines, as well as all types of aggregate
equipment that crushes, screens, and conveys material.
In addition, we build a full line of liquid asphalt
heating and storage systems at our factories in
Tennessee and New Mexico. We also build trenchers
and directional drills that allow contractors
to build edge drains or drill under freeways so
traffic will not be interrupted. We believe our
equipment provides a cost-effective solution for
all those who use our equipment. In addition,
we build a significant portion of the equipment
in North America for the specific categories we
are in.
Q: How might our transportation
system be improved?
A: We believe
that all highways should be built to last longer.
Also, they should be configured so that the investment
in building each lane mile is suited for lower
initial cost, smoother ride, and greater fuel
economy for each and every vehicle that travels
on them.
We also believe a new generation of highway should
be built to allow separation of trucks from cars.
This would save lives, reduce maintenance, conserve
fuel and result in roads that would last longer.
In addition, we believe that the design-build
process should be considered for the majority
of highway projects. The design-build process
takes the specific needs of the highway project
into consideration while improving the speed of
the project itself.
Astec firmly believes that Americans should continue
to enjoy the freedom and ease of travel they have
come to enjoy. This freedom to travel where and
when you choose is central to the American dream.
Through developing specific highway solutions
that are carefully planned, quickly implemented
and long lasting, we can be certain that Americans
and their economy will flourish.
Q: What innovations do you see
coming for road building?
A: At Astec,
we are constantly researching and developing new
equipment, but we also believe that it is important
to review how a better road can be built by looking
at factors beyond the equipment.
One important area of future innovation is in
materials. We should consider a change to individual
aggregate sizes to make the production process
more accurate, and we should blend the material
just as we make hot mix asphalt or concrete. This
would produce a more uniform product and make
our roads last longer. Further, we believe that
more crushing, sizing and fractionating of recycled
aggregates is necessary. If reclaimed asphalt
pavement (RAP) is sized exactly like virgin aggregates,
higher percentages of RAP will be possible in
asphalt mixes.
Additionally, we think a reconsideration of existing
methods on how to mix concrete is necessary. By
rethinking the concrete mixing process, more innovations
will be possible, and these innovations will lower
the cost and improve the quality of concrete used
on highways.
Q: How is the energy crunch
affecting asphalt plant operations, and how do
you see its effects a year from now on the industry
in general?
A: Customers
of our products and others are looking for methods
to be more efficient in their respective locations,
because energy sources, often in the form of oil
products, are certainly their highest cost of
operation item.
The increased cost of oil has also created a
long overdue acceptance of RAP. The rising cost
of liquid asphalt has caused producers who previously
produced 100% virgin mixes to look at RAP as a
lower cost solution.
We are also finding that many of our customers
are looking at methods to lower costs associated
with drying aggregates by either using preheated,
used motor oil for burner fuel, by sloping stockpile
floors for drainage, or by covering their stockpiles.
Producers are also taking advantage of high-efficiency
burner designs with variable frequency controls.
A good example of this kind of burner is Astec
Inc.s Phoenix Talon burner. These burners
lower electrical power consumption, and their
increased control capabilities allow operations
to be more efficient.
Companies who find ways of lowering their energy-related
costs in these or other ways will see success
as soon as a year from now by simply focusing
on this one problem.
Executive
Viewpoint AIG
AIG is one of the largest and most diverse insurers
and providers of risk management services to ARTBA
members in every area of transportationfrom
road and bridge building to mass transit, rail
and airport projects.
Daniel
Conway, President
AIG Construction Risk
Management and Surety
Q: From an insurance standpoint,
how are the challenges and risks changing for
transportation builders?
DC: Hazards
related to transportation projects have improved
greatly with technological advances that allow
for a safer work environment and better end product.
Unfortunately, risks associated with this industry
segment have not diminished to the same extent.
Increased litigation and the challenge of obtaining
and holding onto skilled labor are just two of
the many insurance-related risks contractors face.
There will be added pressures as a result of
heavy damages and unprecedented insurable losses
sustained on the Gulf Coast. Primary carriers
and reinsurers are increasing reserves almost
daily as they discover additional losses. Under
the normal insurance cycle, casualty rates and
coverage availability are not usually affected
by losses in the property sector. However, their
sheer magnitude may require some insurers to raise
rates across multiple lines just to survive.
Rebuilding will demand significant materials
that are already in short supply. Petroleum-based
products are already exorbitantly priced. Shortages
will only add to the problem. Bidding on projects
has become increasingly difficult. Another risk
related to the hurricanes is the uncertainty of
the long-awaited $286.4 billion highway and transit
spending bill. These funds may be at risk if they
are deemed immediately needed for rebuilding.
Many believe the current appropriation is not
adequate. If funds are held up again, it will
have serious future ramifications. Even if funds
are available, contractors are facing the pressure
of securing a skilled labor force. As firms are
forced to bring in unskilled, less highly trained
workers, safety risks escalate. AIG is working
with clients to strengthen safety training programs,
helping builders attain their overall strategic
objectives.
EXCESS LINES
David
Bresnahan
Senior Vice-President
Lexington Insurance Co.
Q: How are very large transportation-related
projects covered?
DB: AIG Construction
Solutions Group covers a high percentage of large
infrastructure projects. In part because AIG is
a one-stop shop with $150 million
of capacity, but also because its credit rating
(AA by Standard & Poors) is among the industrys
highest. Lexington, American Home and Starr Excess
combine to deliver needed capacity for very large
projects. Lexington Insurance also writes companion
Project Specific Professional wrap-ups on these
same large jobs. The security of our dedicated
project limits is preferred compared with multiple,
variable A&E practice policies.
Q: What effects are severe hurricane
losses having on the market?
DB: Estimates
are $40 to $60 billion in losses from Katrina
and Rita, and the season is not yet over. To put
those numbers in perspective, carriers typically
have about $90 billion a year in cash flow. The
impact, coinciding with rising interest rates,
is a recipe for hard property and casualty markets.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Joseph
L. Boren
Chairman & CEO
AIG Environmental
Q: What types of environmental
insurance are typically written on transportation-related
projects?
JB: The most
common is Contractors Pollution Liability, which
protects against claims for third-party bodily
injury, property damage, or cleanup costs/environmental
damages arising from pollution conditions caused
in the performance of covered operations. If a
project entails specific environmental remediation
activities, other environmental policies may apply.
For example; Clean-up Cost Cap covers cost overruns
when environmental remediation costs exceed projected
costs. Contractors Operations Professional Services
may protect environmental contractors against
claims arising out of design errors and omissions.
Q: Do most transportation projects
carry environmental coverage?
JB: Our many
years of experience tells us it is rare for a
highway, airport, rail or mass transit project
to pose no significant environmental risks. Unlike
many other insurance lines, environmental is not
usually mandated by law. Sometimes it is not required
by owners. Even so, the percentage of projects
where environmental insurance is in force is growing
rapidly.
AIG has 25 years of experience providing environmental
coveragemore than any other carrier in the
industry. AIG Environmentals mission is
to raise risk consciousness and help owners, contractors
and design professionals properly address them.
BUILDERS RISK
John
Tutera
Vice President
Product Line Manager
Lexington Insurance Co.
Q: Is the move to design-build
and design-build-operate altering the risk picture?
JT: The risks
can be very different. With design-build, contractors
often take on risks normally allocated to design
professionals. The risks are different, and the
standards can be far more rigorous. Design-build-operate,
an increasingly popular format for toll roads
and some other infrastructure projects, can carry
risks traditionally borne by owners.
Risks must be spelled out in the contract. Before
you sign, understand precisely what you are taking
on. Allocation of risk is negotiable. At the very
least, you must be compensated for the cost of
adequate coverage.
The entire area of project delivery is evolving.
The nature and degree of risks are not well understood
by many. AIG provides clients with contract review
services, including, where needed, development
of risk management programs.
Executive
Viewpoint Degussa
John C. Salvatore
President & CEO
Degussa Construction Chemicals
Q:
How would Degussa like to see ARTBA apply the
results of SAFE-TEA?
A: Degussa
recognizes that ARTBA is a strong organization
developed to give a voice to the large and diverse
transportation construction industry. It is there
to provide our government support, expertise and
guidance when identifying the short and long term
needs of our nations infrastructure and
to apply the necessary resources and funding in
the most effective manner.
Degussa is the worlds largest construction
chemicals company with hundreds of products applicable
to building, strengthening and restoring our nations
infrastructure. As such, we have a tremendous
interest in being able to keep abreast of the
current state of affairs relative to new and retrofit
road and transportation project throughout the
US.
Each state/department of transportation publishes
its list of bridges and the condition of those
bridges. In addition roads are identified as either
concrete or asphalt with repair, maintenance,
and replacement program identified for each. It
would be extremely useful if ARTBA could implement
a program to monitor the progress being made on
the repair and protection of existing structures
as well as the replacement of existing structures
for each DOT.
This would provide everyone one point of contact
to retrieve consistent, non-biased information
of each state/DOT on the use of dollars and provide
evaluations on their performance, progress, etc.
If the information for each state was rated and
reported by one source such as ARTBA, this would
encourage the states and politicians to be more
accountable for their assets and the protection
of those assets.
Q: From Degussas perspective,
what are the most pressing needs for funding?
A: Education.
Costs and consequences need to be made tangible
and easily understandable to the general public.
If a bridge or road is left unrepaired and the
weight limits are reduced, what impact does it
have on our community? Eventually commerce may
suffer thus putting pressure on economic growth.
Second, consumers need to know what they can expect
for a return on their investment. After all, it
is their money (tax dollars) at work. If consumers
knew the true costs (initial + maintenance + lost
productivity/inconvenience) of mishandled road
and bridge projects we would see projects specified
and built with better materials, thus saving time
and money in the long run.
Q: What pertinent Degussa products
have been recently developed?
A: As the worlds
leading construction chemicals company, Degussa
Construction Chemicals offers the most comprehensive
product line in the industry including these newer
products:
Specialty and Paving-Specific
Admixtures These products are added to
ready-mixed concrete to defend against the damage
caused by freeze/thaw cycles, abrasion, corrosion
of reinforcing steel, concrete shrinkage and
subsequent cracking, and chemical reactivity.
Self-Consolidating
Concrete is flowable, non-segregating
concrete that can spread into place, fill the
formwork, and encapsulate the reinforcement
without any mechanical vibration.
Underwater Concreting
An anti-washout admixture for underwater concrete
repairs minimizes the environmental impact of
cement and other fines washing out of the concrete
during placement.
4 x 4 Concrete
a unique method for achieving high-early strength
concrete that obtains at least 400 psi flexural
strength within four hours of placement.
Quick Curing Bridge
Overlay Systems Degadeck products can
be applied in temperatures down to 14° F
(-10° C) and open to traffic within one-hour
after placement.
High Performance
Duct Grouts On bridges with spans reaching
up to 1000 ft, our Masterflow duct grouts protect
the pre-stressing strands from corrosion, letting
them transfer shear stress to the precast concrete
elements.
Seismic Joint Systems
Our Watson Bowman Acme Corp. has a multiple-direction
large movement modular expansion device called
the X-cel System to withstand seismic moments.
Q: Do you have any suggestions
for changing the road and transportation construction
methods in the U.S.?
A: Performance
should be part of the bid package. Imagine if
a contract was let where the winning bidder was
responsible for the construction and the next
10 years of maintenance of the structure. Quality
would improve through innovation, consumer inconvenience
would decrease, and commerce would improve, providing
goods at lower prices to the consumer. A long-term
effect would be a reduction in construction-related
traffic congestion, deaths and lower levels of
greenhouse gases.
|