subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
careers industry jobs
events events
Dodge Data & Analytics
ENR Logo
Web access will be provided
as part of your subscription.

OSHA To Reopen Controversial Crane and Derrick Rules

Text size: A A
Photo courtesy of Howard I. Shapiro and Associates
OSHA intends to push back a looming crane operator certification deadline to give regulators time to review the 2010 regulation.
----- Advertising -----

Crane operators may have three more years to pass exams while the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration considers reopening its regulation on cranes and derricks. Some safety experts say they are glad to see OSHA reviewing the rules; however, feelings are mixed over the proposed testing delay.

"Safety has now been sacrificed," says Robert Weiss, vice president of Maspeth, N.Y.-based Cranes Inc. "The delay is unfortunate, but hopefully we can now correct an inadvertent error."

In 2003, Weiss and 22 other experts formed the Cranes and Derricks Rulemaking Advisory Committee (C-DAC), which proposed a set of rules that OSHA folded into the regulation. "If OSHA had followed C-DAC's intent … then the original certification date could have been met," Weiss says.

Since the final rules were published in 2010, controversy ignited over a requirement for exams to test operators by type and capacity of crane by November 2014. Two testing agencies currently test by type and capacity, while two test only by type. As such, thousands of existing operator certifications would be rendered invalid in 2014. Another issue is the rule's implication that passing an exam qualifies an operator for work; qualification, some argue, should be at the employer's discretion.

OSHA wants to push back testing to allow regulators time to issue a new rule. The deadline would be Nov. 10, 2017.

"It is gratifying that OSHA appears to have responded … but it is unfortunate that OSHA took so long to realize that there was serious industry concern," says Graham Brent, executive director of the National Commission for the Certification of Crane Operators, whose exams are organized only by crane type. "We'll continue to certify the way we are certifying until this issue is resolved."

Others disagree with OSHA's course. "It's time to sort fact from smoke screens," says Debbie Dickinson, executive director of Crane Institute Certification. "CIC was nationally accredited by type and capacity in 2008, two years prior to the regulation, because this structure has meaning and value to employers and operators."


----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.