subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
advertise
careers industry jobs
events events
FAQ
Dodge Data & Analytics
ENR Logo
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
& receive immediate web access
comment

House Transportation Committee Chair Outlines Plan for High-Speed Rail

Text size: A A

House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman John Mica (R-Fla.) on May 26 outlined a high-speed rail (HSR) proposal that would offer an alternative to the $117-billion, 30-year version unveiled by Amtrak last September.

----- Advertising -----

Although both plans offer opportunities for private investment, Mica’s proposal goes much farther—essentially transferring from Amtrak to the private sector the responsibility to develop HSR along portions of the congested Northeast Corridor.

Mica only presented an outline with few details. But he said his proposal, which he plans to incorporate into legislation within the next few weeks, would allow for public-private partnerships to design, build, operate, maintain and finance HSR passenger service along the Northeast Corridor, which runs from Washington, D.C., to Boston.

This plan would be completed in 10 years “at a fraction of the cost” of the Amtrak proposal, he said.

Amtrak’s plan also calls for private investment to finance some infrastructure needed to develop HSR service, but Amtrak would retain its role as the system’s key developer and operator.

At a May 26 congressional hearing, Mica was critical of Amtrak’s proposal. “Amtrak’s plan to bring high-speed service to the Northeast Corridor is unacceptable. We can attract private sector resources and expertise and do it in less than half the time.”

Other GOP lawmakers said they supported Mica’s proposal. Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) said, We’ve tried it Amtrak’s way without success for nearly 40 years and it’s time to go down a new path and inject private sector competition.”

But most Democratic lawmakers were skeptical. Ranking member Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) said, “I fear this is just another veiled attempt at derailing Amtrak under the guise of better service and cost savings.” He said that Congress has consistently underfunded Amtrak, hindering its ability to make the infrastructure improvements needed to develop HSR.

Rahall added that several private investors had said at a Transportation and Infrastructure Committee roundtable in January that they would need to see substantial federal funding as part of the effort in order to consider investing.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), who testified before the committee, told reporters afterwards that “Frankly, it’s going to be a heck of a difficulty to get the type of investment that’s required” in Mica’s plan. 

But Mica said he was confident it could be done. He highlighted examples of profitable private-sector HSR operations, including Great Britain’s Virgin Rail. “If anyone is holding their breath for Congress to approve $117 billion for Amtrak’s 30-year plan, they’re going to turn blue,” he said.

An Amtrak spokesman said Amtrak will refrain from commenting on Mica’s proposal until the detailed plan is released in mid-June. However, Amtrak officials in January stressed the importance of keeping the Northeast Corridor public.

 

Keywords:

----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at www.dodge.construction.com.

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.