subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
careers industry jobs
events events
Dodge Data & Analytics
ENR Logo
Web access will be provided
as part of your subscription.

In Surprise, Fluor Loses Arbitration Over U.K. Wind Farm Claim

Text size: A A

A U.K. arbitration panel surprised Fluor Corp. and its investors last month with a ruling against the contractor's $480-million claim for additional compensation from owners of the Greater Gabbard wind farm off the coast of England. As a result, Fluor said on Nov. 17 it will take a $400-million charge in the fourth quarter but says the action will not materially affect cash flow.

"Fluor delivered a quality project, and we are extremely disappointed with this unexpected decision," said company Chairman and CEO David Seaton. He noted owner statements acknowledging that the $1.8-billion lump-sum project's 140 turbines are commissioned and exporting electricity and that performance "is more than 10% ahead of the client's expectations."

The dispute centers on faults, thought mainly to concern welds, in 35 of the project's large-diameter, 600-tonne steel-tube "monopile" turbine foundations. Owner Greater Gabbard Offshore Winds Ltd. claims 52 steelwork sleeves, or "transition pieces," which fit over the monopiles to support the turbine towers, are faulty. The firm is co-owned by Scottish utility SSE plc. and the U.K. unit of Germany's RWE Innogy GmbH.

Fluor's claim was for additional testing and repairs on faulty steelwork. The owner's counterclaim, set for a hearing next year and believed to be at least as large, arises partly from its own testing of suspect structures to determine if they meet "required contractual standards," it says in a statement.

The owner declines to elaborate further on the problems or remedies. But SSE claims the project operator has introduced "a number of risk control measures, allowing the turbines to function." It notes "access restrictions" at the disputed turbine sites. The 500-MW field has been in full operation since September, producing 132, 200 MW per hour that month and the next, says SSE.

Jamie Cook, managing director at Credit Suisse, termed the ruling and counterclaim "discouraging, as most thought Fluor was in the clear." She says the firm "has traditionally been viewed as one of the higher-quality E&C names that is more immune from charges of this size and projects of this risk profile." A published report says Fluor and SSE remain in a joint venture to build two 525-MW wind projects off the coast of Scotland.


----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.