Libraries present the same opportunity as museums. Both of these public buildings offer a chance for architects to stretch the limits of basic design and create iconic, public spaces that help define a community. While city halls, courthouses and even skyscrapers certainly can act in similar ways, often the most artistic of expression occurs when art itself signifies part of the process.

And that is exactly why design-forward buildings work for libraries and museums, because part of the function for those does fall into the column of architectural intrigue. A few weeks back I pointed out that the designs—created by architects, but only ones working for contractors—for the new Royal Alberta Museum in Edmonton failed to meet those standards, instead presenting an obviously cost-conscious take on a big-box museum. Of course, not everyone agrees that art should play a major factor. Some say cost should take the lead and “iconic” looks aren’t worth the financial price, no matter the “cultural” payback. Let the debate ensue.