subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
advertise
careers careers
events events
FAQ
subscriber login subscriber service
ENR Logo
Subscribe to ENR Magazine for only
$82 a year (includes full web access)

transportation
BRIDGE RESEARCH
Geosynthetic Layers Support Ohio County Abutments
 
By Aileen Cho

An Ohio county engineering department is shaving weeks and thousands of dollars off replacement of simple bridges by using geosynthetic reinforced-soil (GRS) technology in the abutments. Defiance County re-cently completed replacement of its 16th bridge in about three weeks at $80,000 using GRS—shaving off an estimated $20,000 and two weeks from the 28-ft-long reinforced-concrete structure.

Layers of fill and geotextile fabrics create an economical and efficient method of building bridge components.
Defiance County
Layers of fill and geotextile fabrics create an economical and efficient method of building bridge components.

Using stockpiled components of 35-lb concrete blocks, gravel and rolls of geotextile fabric, crews built the 50-ft-wide abutments in 2.5 days, says Warren Schlatter, county engineer. “We’ll build three or four bridges a year for the foreseeable future” using GRS, he says.

The principle behind GRS is alternating layers of compacted local soil with sheets of geotextiles to create a composite-acting material, contained by concrete blocks, says Mike Adams, research engineer with the Federal Highway Administration. Adams was inspired by the U.S. Forest Service’s use of closely spaced, moderately weak geotextile fill in the 1970s on logging roads. He has tested the technology around the country, most notably on full-scale bridge piers at Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center in McLean, Va., and in conjunction with the Colorado Dept. of Transportation.

Defiance County appears to be the only agency embracing regular use of the technology. After Adams made a presentation to an Ohio county engineers’ association several years ago, Schlatter decided to try GRS. “We were a bit skeptical,” he recalls. “No way can you put bridge beams on gravel, our crews said.” The county first tried GRS on non-critical locations like wingwalls and culverts. But in 2005, Schlatter decided to use it on abutments for a small bridge with precast concrete beams. Adams tested for stresses and settlement with instrumentation. “To date, the bridge has hardly moved at all,” says Schlatter. It was built in six weeks instead of months.

Related Links:
  • Laser-Equipped Van Eases Atlanta Runway Inspections
  • According to Adams, GRS so far has worked well with simple spans of up to 120 ft, with low traffic loads and concrete superstructure. Defiance County next spring will try GRS on its first steel-girder bridge, about 125 ft long.

    “It’s good for the ‘bread-and-butter bridges,” Adams notes. “People are beginning to understand this technology apart from traditional mechanically stabilized earth.” Ongoing research will address questions of long-term serviceability and maximum traffic loads.

     

     

     



     
    ----- Advertising -----
      Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
    Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
    Other Voices: Highly opinionated industry observers offer commentary from around he world.
    Featured Video
    Advertising Opportunities
    Global Sourcebook Global Sourcebook

    • December 28 Issue
    • December 7 Ad Close

    Stay top of mind in print and online to the owners, engineers and contractors you need to reach.
    Get connected today by contacting your account manager, call: 800-458-3842 or