subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
advertise
careers careers
events events
FAQ
subscriber login subscriber service
ENR Logo
Subscribe to ENR Magazine for only
$82 a year (includes full web access)

transportation
ROADS
Contractor Appeals Charge In Stalled Oregon Highway Job
 
By Adrian MacDonald

Granite Construction Co. last week filed a request for an informal hearing to discuss a $240,000 fine levied by the Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality. In the Sept. 20 request, the Watsonville, Calif.-based firm disputes the charge of “acting recklessly” in alleged en-vironmental violations associated with the U.S. 20 highway realignment be­tween Pioneer Mountain and Eddyville.

Puddle-Free


Puddle-Free


Puddle-Free
Yaquina River Constructors
Mountainous site has underground slides, which has halted work.

DEQ is looking at scheduling a hearing this month, says agency spokesman Jeff Bachman.

Widespread surface ero­sion on the 10-mile project site over the winter led to the largest fine ever issued by the state DEQ. The $150-million project had already hit two snags at the start in summer 2006: ob­taining right-of-way access and the discovery of ancient underground landslides throughout the mountainous site that created un­stable conditions for bridges.

While right-of-way was eventually granted, Granite found the underground landslide conditions would make the existing design prohibitively expensive, estimating cost overruns of up to $61 million. In July the firm agreed to a nine-month work suspension to analyze alternatives.

Geoff Boraston, Granite’s director of environmental affairs, says that, during summer 2006, the Oregon Dept. of Transportation requested that the firm accelerate the project to compensate for delays. This led to the clearing of some 160 acres of forest. Crews were forced to move to new areas before finishing old ones. By the end of the summer the firm was unable to secure the cleared area for the winter to keep soil erosion from impacting salmon streams, he says.

“The original plan was to work in stages, so we would work in one area and then close it up,” Boraston says. “Because of the ancient landslides, we could not proceed with that approach.”

Bachman says the explanation is unsatisfactory. “They fail to ex­plain what it was exactly about the right-of-way or landslide concerns that necessitated opening up large areas that were not being worked last winter,” he says.

ODOT, which received a $90,000 fine from DEQ last spring for related storm­water violations, maintains that there was no link between the discovery of the landslides and the soil erosion. ODOT spokesman Joe Harwood says, “Mr. Boraston is misinformed.”

 


----- Advertising -----

 
----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Other Voices: Highly opinionated industry observers offer commentary from around he world.
Reader Photos
Photos from ENR Jobsite Photo Showcase