An unusual Senate
coalition of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans
has mustered enough votes to block a massive energy bill--at
least for the time being. In a procedural vote on Nov. 21,
proponents of the $30-billion-plus measure fell two votes
short of the 60 they needed to cut off debate, effectively
barring passage.
The outcome was a defeat for President
Bush, who supported the energy measure, and Senate energy
committee Chairman Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), who drafted much
of the legislation.
Fristseeks
another vote on bill soon
But the energy bill may not be
dead yet. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said
he would call for at least one more vote early next week to
end debate on the legislation and get it approved. Sen. Charles
Schumer (D-N.Y.), a leader of the anti-bill contingent, said
he thought his side has a good chance of holding enough support
to keep the measure from passing, but said the bill's advocates
would try to "pick off" the two additional votes they need,
by promising those lawmakers legislative favors in the coming
omnibus spending package.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who
voted with Schumer, said that the bill's allies were trying
to snare votes. "The store is open," McCain said. "The auction
still goes on."
Although Democrats grumbled that
they were cut out of much of the bill's drafting, the votes
to end debate on it lined up more by region than party. Farm
Belt Senators of both parties, including Minority Leader Tom
Daschle (D-S.D.) supported the bill, in large part because
of its provision to more than double production of ethanol,
a fuel additive made from corn.
advertisement
...
On the other hand, New England
Republicans and Democrats voted to block the package, partly
because of provisions that they viewed as harmful to the environment.
A particular target was the liability protection the bill
provided to makers of the gasoline additive MTBE.
Some of the bill's foes had a
more wide-ranging criticism. . McCain (R-Ariz.) blasted it
as "a grab bag of special-interest projects" and has dubbed
it the "no lobbyist left behind" bill. Schumer said, "The
bill seemed to feel that pork was a substitute for a policy."
Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.), a strong
conservative, objected to the measure's high price tag, noting
that its tax breaks totaled $25 billion, triple the total
President Bush had proposed. "This is an energy bill that
busted the budget," Sununu charged.
Schumer helped
lead opposition
Business interests were disappointed
at the outcome. National Association of Manufacturers Vice
President Mark Whitenton criticized the vote as the "irresponsible
politics of obstruction" and said the measure would have helped
the economy. He said, "Considering that American manufacturing
has lost nearly 3 million jobs the last three years, I find
it simply astounding that a Senate minority would kill this
admittedly imperfect but hugely beneficial energy bill."
The energy bill's story may have
more chapters, however.Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), an opponent
of the measure, cautioned, "This is not the last battle. There
is much more to happen on this legislation."
(Photos courtesy of Office
of Sen. Bill Frist and Office of Senator Charles Schumer)
• December 28 Issue
• December 7 Ad Close
Stay top of mind in print and online to the owners, engineers and contractors you need to reach.
Get connected today by contacting your account manager, call: 800-458-3842 or