An extended period
of unstable electricity prices in the West has politicians
scrambling to ease the pain of customers whose rates have
doubled and tripled. But independent generation developers,
undaunted by the prospect of politically motivated manipulation
of the market, are forging ahead with plans to meet urgent
demand.
(Graphics
by Nancy Soulliard for ENR)
The extraordinary rate hikes in
California's San Diego and Orange counties have led even strong
proponents of the state's deregulation process to question
its wisdom (ENR 8/7 p. 14). On Aug. 21, the state Public Utilities
Commission caved in to political pressure, approving a rate
cap for commercial and residential customers.
San Jose-based developer Calpine
Corp. remains committed to California. Spokesman Bill Highlander
says 65% of Calpine's output is sold under long-term contracts,
leaving 35% exposed to the cap. Calpine expects to finish
the $250-million, 500-Mw combined-cycle Los Medanos powerplant
in Pittsburg next year.
California's lengthy siting and
permitting process is a special area of concern, says Richard
Wheatley, spokesman for Reliant Energy, Houston. Gov. Gray
Davis (D) this month issued an executive order directing state
permitting agencies to expedite siting without compromising
public health or environmental quality. Steven Kelly, policy
director at Sacramento-based Independent Energy Producers
Association, says his staff's work with the California Energy
Commission may help reduce siting time from 12 to six months.
California's woes so far do not
appear to be weakening support for market restructuring elsewhere.
Jim McDonald, a spokesman for Arizona Public Service Co.,
contends that the crisis in San Diego and Orange counties
has not given anyone pause. "We expect significant generation
to come on line during the next three years to ease the market
pressure," he says. By 2010, APS's load is expected to
increase by 1,500 Mw. APS alone plans to add 3,000 Mw of new
capacity, he says.
Nevada too is plunging ahead.
Under a settlement approved in July by the state Public Utilities
Commission, Nevada Power Co. will be permitted increases totaling
7%. Capacity addition could follow "if the market opens
up here, and we have some stability in the rules," says
Duane Nelson, director of transmission development for Reno,
Nev.-based Sierra Pacific Power Co. "We're seeing some
significant interest in building new capacity."
In the Pacific Northwest, electricity
price spikes, though less severe, are forcing some companies
to cut back on production or shut down. A copper mine, some
aluminum plants and paper mills laid off thousands of workers
this summer. Administrators for the Bonneville Power Administration
blame increased demand, supply shortage and lagging development
of new power sources for the energy crisis. But industry growth
is looming on the horizon.
"The big issue is that
the power industry is still regulated," says Bob Boschee
of Smurfit-Stone Corp., a cardboard manufacturing plant in
Frenchtown, Mont. Boschee curtailed his plant's operations
when prices jumped from $25 per Mw to $150. "There are
not enough players to create a true free market. If we get
totally deregulated it would be a good thing."
That may take some time. Montana
in 1997 led the way in the Northwest. In 2001, Oregon will
allow industrial and large commercial customers access to
the free market. But other states are "approaching deregulation
cautiously," says Marilyn Meehan of the Utilities and
Transportation Commission in Olympia, which has not entered
the restructuring arena. Idaho also hasn't moved on restructuring
as yet.
BPA Administrator Judi Johansen
says the region is "in imminent danger of electricity
deficits." The Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland,
Ore., says the region needs 3,000 Mw added to the system by
2003 to head off projected deficiencies.
But new facilities are not going
up quickly enough. "Companies looking for locations to
build powerplants typically look at market conditions,"
says Jef Freeman, vice president of Cogentrix Energy Inc.,
Charlotte, N.C., which plans to complete work on a 250 Mw
gas-fired plant at Rathdrum, Idaho, next year.
FINISHING
UP Los Medanos rises despite California's rate
caps. (Photo courtesy of Calpine Corp.)
Most states have already streamlined
the permitting process. What was once a 30-month process in
Montana now takes about a year, says Larry Nordell of the
Dept. of Environmental Quality. In Oregon, where regulators
are concerned over increased emissions, contractors face a
process that could extend 18 months to two years, says John
White, energy facility analyst with the Office of Energy.
Idaho has no central permitting.
Developers say they can tolerate
temporary tinkering with price caps. Although concerned about
California's actions, no one so far seems ready to walk away
from what is still considered a promising investment.
• December 28 Issue
• December 7 Ad Close
Stay top of mind in print and online to the owners, engineers and contractors you need to reach.
Get connected today by contacting your account manager, call: 800-458-3842 or