|
|
| White
Knuckles. The tension lay in building the network. The
software simply worked. |
Satisfaction ruled
at the Kongressenter in Oslo, Norway, as 15 software developers
networked their laptops and performed a miracle before 300
true-believers of open data exchange.
Presenting at a June 1 International
Alliance for Interoperability event, developers used a string
of European construction-related programs that import and
export object-based 3-D data as .ifcfiles. They sequentially
modified a project in their own programs before saving as
.ifc and passing it on. Transfers were swift, apparently flawless
and gained an audit trail of changes as they progressed.
 |
| MacLeamy |
Patrick MacLeamy, CEO in the San
Francisco office of architectural and engineering firm HOK,
and chair of the International Alliance for Interoperability,
pronounced himselfwith some help from the audienceFjetret.
Loosely translated from Norwegian, it means "blown away."
IAIs standard-setting work
on a building data scheme called the Industry Foundation Classes,
or IFCs, enabled the exchange. MacLeamy says the most recent
edition of the IFCs, 2x2, shows the system is ready for business.
"The first five years were spent getting to a complete
package that was usable," he says. Now, IAI is refocusing
from building technical content "to getting the word
out that the IFCs really work."
Norway, with a population of 4.5
million and a cohesive construction industry, is one country
taking the lead on interoperability, and it is embracing the
IFCs. But also in the forefront and using the IFCs is Singapore,
of similar population and with a similarly cohesive industry.
Both countries have government-sponsored drives to increase
economic efficiency across multiple sectors, including construction,
through the integration of information and communications
technology, or ICT, that encourages "frictionless"
data exchange.
Cheng Tai Fatt, senior manager
of Singapores building plan department in the building
construction authority, showed "ePlanCheck," a 3-D
model checking system built around IFC mapping to local building
regulations. It can automatically review designs for code
compliance. Designers can repeatedly submit models, or even
parts of models, over the Internet for preliminary checks
that flag issues likely to block approval.
Fatt says the goal is to remove
inconsistent interpretations, give 24-hour self-checking capabilities
to designers and reduce the rejection rate of final submissions.
He says Singapore intends "to reengineer the industry
business process through IT and achieve a quantum leap in
turn-around time and productivity."
After seeing ePlanCheck in October
2003, Norwegian building authorities began planning their
own IFC-based system for application review, with a difference.
They began by working with IAI to map the IFC building data
scheme to zoning and planning data in Norways geographic
information systems. The project will be done this month.
The system will feed into ByggSøk, a national regulatory
information and permitting e-submissions system already in
place. The IFC-GIS tool will be used to automate checks of
zoning submissions of .ifc-compliant models. "Were
on target," says Oivind Rooth, project manager of ByggSøk.
(Photos by tom sawyer for ENR)
|