subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
advertise
careers industry jobs
events events
FAQ
ENR Logo
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
& receive immediate web access
comment

Searching for Clues in Quake-Maddened Seas

The explosive force of tsunamis challenge engineers. The U.S. Pacific Northwest
coast is vulnerable.

Text size: A A
[ Page 2 of 2 ]

“The No. 1 failing in Japan was that they underestimated their hazard,” says Dengler, who just returned from a 10-day examination of the tsunami wasteland. “When you underestimate the hazard, everything else fails—the engineering, the education, the policies, the response ... they fell so short. It's discouraging.” She says her team is reexamining everything now in light of lessons from Japan.

----- Advertising -----

Yumei Wang, a geotechnical engineer focused on risk management and the geo-hazard section leader at the Oregon's Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries, (DOGAMI ), is at the forefront of efforts to protect people in Oregon's tsunami zone. She says the Tohoku quake is “a brutal reminder that we are not doing nearly enough.”

Wang says the southern half of Oregon's 300-mile coastline has high ground that can provide refuge for coastal residents. However, her biggest concern is the central and north coast, a lower area with extensive flatlands. “I've identified 12 communities that should be considering vertical evacuation,” Wang says. “They are so far from being ready.”

Just as in Japan, officials here on the West Coast warn that the only reliable way to escape a tsunami is to go to high ground on foot. Cars get stuck in traffic. Roads rarely take the shortest route uphill. In the case of the Pacific Northwest, where the CSZ is so near the shore, a tsunami could be on the beach in less than 20 minutes in most places.

Inundation maps throughout the CSZ coast are progressively being refined. Most now are based on modeling of dozens of runs of both distant-source and near-source tsunamis, with partial slips or complete slips along the entire length of the CSZ. Models project across the local bathymetry and topography. Predicted heights vary by location.

Raskin says the design tsunami for Cannon Beach is based on a DOGAMI study; the state has 95% confidence that it covers all possible tsunami events. “The decision to keep with the 95% confidence level was based primarily on the fact that the worst-case scenario is a one-in-10,000-year event,” Raskin says. The inundation for that 100% solution is 25 ft higher.

The conceptual plan for a new city hall calls for an elevated, 10,000-sq-ft building with deep concrete piles laterally braced by post-tensioned grade beams, with a post-tensioned municipal office floor and rooftop terrace. Three sets of external stairs lead to the main floor, which is 15 ft above grade, including one that is obviously a grand stairway to safety.

No Visible Damage

Raskin says Kent Yu, a seismic engineer in Portland and principal with San Francisco-based Degenkolb Engineers, is working on the city-hall project. He says Yu recommended, based on his observations in quake-disaster zones around the world, the building be engineered to withstand extreme seismic loading without showing damage, Raskin says. Frequently, people will not reoccupy buildings after a quake if they see damage, even if the building is declared safe. “If we only have 20 minutes to get people in, there should be no hesitation at all,” Raskin says.

The building may cost about $4 million—twice the cost of a conventional solution, Raskin says. Hopes for a congressional appropriation are dead for now, but the town is applying to get funding as a disaster mitigation project through FEMA. Raskin believes mitigation funding would be a good solution and set a precedent that could benefit towns all along the coast.

Meanwhile, Yu has been hired to do a comprehensive study of Cannon Beach's resilience to disasters. “I was asked to look at the effect of the earthquake and/or tsunami on their community and to look at government resilience, because we don't want to become another Haiti, incapacitated by disaster,” he says.

“We need to look at the bridges, wastewater, hospitals and schools and get a general idea of what's going to happen,” Yu says, referring to a major seismic and tusnamic event as an inevitability, as many planning officials in the region now do. “We need to look at it from an economic perspective: What will be the effects of a disaster on recovery? Also, we need to look at the civic infrastructure—the social networks, the non-governmental, community-based and faith-based organizations. These organizations provide very critical services to the community.”

Yu admits that such a study may seem a broad portfolio for a structural engineer, but he says, as a member of a state seismic safety policy advisory commission, he is interested in promoting a safety policy to make the state more resilient to seismic events. He says, “When I do engineering projects, I can only solve one thing at a time. When I look at the policy level, I can bring more impact to society.”

 

[ Page 2 of 2 ]
----- Advertising -----
Video
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at www.dodge.construction.com.

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.