subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
careers industry jobs
events events
Dodge Data & Analytics
ENR Logo
Web access will be provided
as part of your subscription.

Afghanistan Reconstruction Contract Administration Needs Overhaul, U.S. Senate Committee Warns

Text size: A A
[ Page 1 of 2 ]

As the U.S. government prepares to ramp down military operations in Afghanistan, a new congressional report warns that the billions of dollars being spent in financial aid to the war-torn nation are achieving achieving limited success and calls for more scrutiny on the types of projects, including reconstruction projects, that are funded.

AP Wideworld
The U.S. must improve oversight of reconstruction contracting in Afghanistan, according to a Congressional report. The government is under pressure to improve quality and sustainability, as it prepares to draw down forces. A worker carries plywood at a security checkpoint under construction near Khoshi in May 2001.
----- Advertising -----

The congressional report concludes that, going forward, any projects should be “necessary, achievable and sustainable.”

Released on June 8 by Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the report does not focus exclusively on the reconstruction effort but looks at the entire civilian effort to stabilize and rebuild Afghanistan. The Senate investigation dovetails with recent critical reports from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) and the Wartime Contracting Commission. Common themes are mismanaged contracts in Afghanistan and ingrained corruption and waste in the country.

“This report is meant to be constructive,” said committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.). “It is a report with critical observations,” but those observations are made “with the best spirit of joint cooperation,” he said.

According to SIGAR, Congress has provided more than $17.3 billion to rebuild Afghanistan since 2002, and the president has asked for an additional $17.3 billion for fiscal 2012.

However, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee report urges the administration to think carefully about how to allocate aid dollars.

“Spending aid effectively in Afghanistan is extremely challenging, given the security climate, abject poverty, weak indigenous capacity, widespread corruption and poor governance,” the report’s authors say. They go on to make a distinction: “Afghanistan is not Iraq.”

The Senate report also cites the admission by Morristown, N.J.-based Louis Berger Group earlier this year that it had overbilled the U.S. government more than $10 million in fees. The Berger case is a prime example of the need for better oversight of federal contractors.

The overarching theme of the congressional report, as well as other studies has been the need for the federal government to ensure projects are able to stand on their own feet after the U.S. military exits.

"The Senate Foreign Relations Committee rightly highlights sustainability as a key issue in Afghanistan, which is something that SIGAR has been focusing on for some time," says the acting Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Herbert Richardson.


[ Page 1 of 2 ]
----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.