subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
careers industry jobs
events events
Dodge Data & Analytics
ENR Logo
Web access will be provided
as part of your subscription.

Insufficient Past-Performance Data Used in Awards

Text size: A A

Federal agencies are not relying enough on each other’s contractor past-performance data in making new awards, due to the unreliability of the information or difficulty assessing its relevance, says a new study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The report, requested by Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, says even with the creation in 2002 of a governmentwide retrieval system for such data, its use is not widespread. It reviewed 62 fiscal 2007 and 2008 solicitations in the Depts. of Energy, Defense and Homeland Security, among oth- ers, and interviewed 121 contracting officials.

----- Advertising -----


----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.