subscribe to ENR magazine subscribe
contact us
careers industry jobs
events events
Dodge Data & Analytics
ENR Logo
Web access will be provided
as part of your subscription.

Source of Forged Surety Bonds Remains Mysterious

Text size: A A
[ Page 1 of 2 ]
Courtesy of St. Mary's County, Md.
Architectural rendering of the future Patuxent Naval Air Station Museum.
----- Advertising -----

Federal investigators are reportedly trying to locate the source of fraudulent surety bonds provided to a small Maryland prime contactor for its work on a museum and visitor’s center at the Patuxent Naval Air Base in St. Mary’s County, Md. The county has taken steps to terminate the contractor, an action its attorneys say they are trying to prevent because their client has been the victim of a fraud and has lost $175,000 in premium paid for the bonds.

The performance bond covered the contractor’s work on the $4.7-million building project, which broke ground with an opening ceremony in October but is now stalled.

St. Mary’s County ordered the contractor, Baltimore-based Broughton Construction Co., to stop work December 7.

The stalled project recently came to public attention when the prime contractor was unable to satisfy the county with a replacement surety bond.

A unit of The Chubb Group, Warren, N.J.-based Pacific Indemnity Co., had informed St. Mary’s County that the payment and performance bonds provided by Broughton were forgeries, according to a letter by the county sent to Broughton. A spokesman for the Chubb Group declined to comment.

A St. Mary’s county spokesman refrained from commenting, too, citing pending litigation. In response to ENR's request, the county provided copies of bond documents and its letter to Broughton instructing the firm to supply a new bond.

To remedy the situation, the contractor had offered to provide 20% retainage to the county and new guarantees from an individual surety.

But the county rejected the substitute bonds provided by Broughton and threatened to terminate Broughton for default, according to Charles M. Asmar, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney who represents the contractor. Broughton's contract does not provide for termination for reasons beyond the contractor's control, says Asmar.

“Broughton bent over backwards,” but “the county rejected everything” and wanted a treasury-listed surety, adds Christopher Taggi, a partner of Asmar’s.

According to Asmar, the Federal Bureau of Investigation is among the agencies searching for the source of the forged payment and performance bonds provided to Broughton.


[ Page 1 of 2 ]
----- Advertising -----
  Blogs: ENR Staff   Blogs: Other Voices  
Critical Path: ENR's editors and bloggers deliver their insights, opinions, cool-headed analysis and hot-headed rantings
Project Leads/Pulse

Gives readers a glimpse of who is planning and constructing some of the largest projects throughout the U.S. Much information for pulse is derived from McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge.

For more information on a project in Pulse that has a DR#, or for general information on Dodge products and services, please visit our Website at

Information is provided on construction projects in following stages in each issue of ENR: Planning, Contracts/Bids/Proposals and Bid/Proposal Dates.

View all Project Leads/Pulse »

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.